Overview
Security code reviews fail in two directions. Too-shallow: reviewer flags "consider input validation" with no specifics. Too-deep: automated SAST floods PRs with 200 findings, 90% false positives, so developers ignore all of them. Neither moves the security posture.
The Security Code Review Framework structures reviews around threat classes (injection, auth flaws, secrets exposure, insecure deserialization, SSRF, race conditions) with language-specific patterns (JavaScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust, C#), prioritizes findings by CVSS-lite (exploitability × impact × scope), and produces fix-grade reports with remediation code — so developers merge the fix, not just the label.
What you get: - Pre-review threat model (what attacks matter for this code) - OWASP Top 10 + language-specific checklist per review - Finding template with reproducer, impact, fix code - Prioritization (Critical / High / Medium / Low) with CVSS-style scoring - Authentication & authorization patterns per stack - Secrets and crypto review patterns - Dependencies and supply chain review - Review metrics and program maturity model
Built for: security engineers, senior developers, platform teams, and code review moderators who need reviews that developers merge — not paper findings that don't close.